Champion profile

Ziggs in draft

Played at ADC in 90% of its games. A role under 30 games still opens, with counts only.

Presence (pick + ban)

6 %

picked or banned · 114th of 173 championshalf of the champions are under 9.4%

Picked 3% · 636 of 18,487 gamesBanned 2% · 406 of 17,475 drafts with bans

Win rate at ADC

18,487 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR

Population: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes — neither solo queue nor the pro scene.

Everything below reads on 571 games at ADC. · 493 drafts without entered bans excluded from the ban denominator (17,475 games with bans) · Index built on Oct 27, 2026, 1:37 AM

In short

Four answers. Each card opens its chapter.

01 · In draftOpening ban: removed in phase 1.Banned, it makes room for

Sivir

Mel

02 · In a compWhat sets it apart from other ADCTeamfightLets allies carryDamagePokeFew duels

03 · With / againstGood against Ezreal, bad against Yunara.Good against

Ezreal68%37 gamesBad against

Yunara34%41 gamesBad duo with

Alistar36%36 games

04 · BuildOne path: Luden's Echo.

Arcane Comet

Ban it or pick it?

Its place in the scene's drafts, and what happens when it is not there.

Where it is played

Share of ADC picks taken by Ziggs, and its ban share, in each source

SoloQ

Master+ · ranked games of tracked players

0.8%4,669 picks out of 558,542banned in 0.5% of games · 414 of 86,901patches 16.21 → 16.19filtered by region

Tournaments

tournament code games

1.4%291 picks out of 21,472banned in 1.9% of games · 190 of 10,152patches 16.21 → 16.19filtered by region

Pro

all leagues · lolesports

1.6%36 picks out of 2,194lolesports does not provide banspatches 16.20 → 16.17region filter not applicable

Frequency only: share of the role's picks in each source, over ITS last 3 patches with games — the page's period does not apply · under 30 games in the role, not measured · the three sources are never added up · ban share over games whose bans are read only (soloQ: games collected since 10/17)

Presence by patch

Between 5% and 22% since 16.12 · 5.4% on 16.21 · 6.6% on 16.20

show the detail of the 10 patches

Patch	Presence	Games	Majority keystone
16.21	5.4%	2,671	Arcane Comet94% · 62
16.20	6.6%	7,858	Arcane Comet97% · 247
16.19	5.8%	6,733	Arcane Comet91% · 172
16.18	6.8%	5,762	Arcane Comet96% · 186
16.17	8.4%	5,728	Arcane Comet98% · 238
16.16	9.4%	5,992	Arcane Comet95% · 272
16.15	18.6%	5,530	Arcane Comet96% · 482
16.14	21.8%	5,702	Arcane Comet96% · 603
16.13	13.5%	7,391	Arcane Comet94% · 527
16.12	8.0%	5,118	Arcane Comet93% · 188

Presence = picks + bans over the patch's games, all regions · the axis follows the calendar: a patch without games leaves a void · hollow point under 30 games, nothing compared

When it gets banned

Opening ban: removed in phase 1.

406 bans of 17,475 drafts with bans · the phase in strong ink grounds the reading line

Fearless

Fearless: fallback pick — brought out late in the series, once the pool is drained.

G12.1%
G22.8%
G3+3.8%

Once burnt, the series moves to

Jhin12

Sivir8

Miss Fortune7

series, of 88 where it is played in G1 then replaced at the same role

Share of each series game where it is picked · replacements: series where it is played in G1 then replaced at the same role (88), published from 30 series

If it is banned, they pick

What is played more often at ADC when Ziggs is banned than when it is free, on both sides.

Read at ADC, its main role: a ban has no role, it takes this one away first.

Sivir
7.2% → 11.3%
Mel
1.2% → 4.9%

406 games where it is banned · 16,473 where it is free and not picked · share of the role's picks: ○ free → ● banned · what the ban brings out, never why

When it is picked, the scene protects itself from

Comps with Ziggs ban these champions in phase 2 more often than other comps.

Dr. Mundo×1.64

× = phase 2 bans in its comps relative to other comps, kept from ×1.25 · 44,638 tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12, the draft review window

What does it bring to a comp?

What its kit brings to its team, phase by phase, then in fights.

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other ADCBoth builds mixed: per-build profile not measured yet

Phase by phase

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Damage / mintick = the ADC

Lane · 5–14 min

Mid game · 15–22

Late · 23–30

Gold vs. direct opponent

Lane · 5–14 min

Mid game · 15–22

Late · 23–30

Not measured after 20 min: gold then follows the game's result.

Map pressuretakedowns outside its lane

Lane · 5–14 min

Not applicable to this position.

After 15 min

Measured before 15 min only.

Damage to champions per minute, at equal gold · gold against the direct opponent on a fixed ± 1,000 scale · map pressure before 15 min

In fights

itADC
Damage absorbed per minute.
Share of its takedowns taken with several allies.
Share of its takedowns taken in a duel.
Damage from its four allies per kill when it takes part: a high rank means it lets its allies carry the damage, a low rank that it carries it itself.
Riot CC score per minute.
Share of its team's damage.

Bar centred on ADC: to the right, more than them; to the left, less · fixed order, never sorted by value

What it is, what it is not

What marks itTeamfightLets allies carryDamagePoke

What it is notFew duels

Split-push — Not applicable to this position.

Labels set by the server: the fact's criterion when it has one, otherwise the role rank (from 75 or at 25 and below)

Its tempo

level 6 at 7:06 (7:18), 1st item at 11:36 (11:42), 2nd at 19:36 (18:00), 3rd at 26:06 (23:48).

571 games · median minute of each milestone, ADC in brackets

With whom, against whom?

The win rate is a range: only a range entirely on one side of 50% says something.

Allies and opponents

Its opponents, most frequent first.

Facing	Games	Reading
Kai'SaADC	78	Unfavourablebetween 31% and 49%
Lee SinJGL	66	Leans against itbetween 32% and 51%
NautilusSUP	65	Unfavourablebetween 28% and 47%
CaitlynADC	56	Leans its waybetween 46% and 67%
LuluSUP	48	Leans against itbetween 31% and 54%
LeonaSUP	42	Leans against itbetween 31% and 56%
YunaraADC	41	Unfavourablebetween 23% and 47%
ThreshSUP	41	Leans its waybetween 41% and 66%
ViJGL	39	Leans against itbetween 29% and 54%
MalphiteTOP	37	Leans against itbetween 28% and 54%

show 139 other pairs

WukongJGL	37	Unfavourablebetween 24% and 49%
EzrealADC	37	Favourablebetween 54% and 79%
BlitzcrankSUP	36	Leans its waybetween 42% and 68%
SionTOP	35	Leans its waybetween 41% and 67%
SylasMID	35	Evenbetween 38% and 65%
Jarvan IVJGL	34	Evenbetween 39% and 66%
AhriMID	32	Leans against itbetween 30% and 58%
LucianADC	32	Unfavourablebetween 22% and 49%
ApheliosADC	31	Leans its waybetween 47% and 74%
SyndraMID	30	Leans against itbetween 33% and 61%
RenektonTOP	29	Too few for a rate (29 of 30)
SylasJGL	29	Too few for a rate (29 of 30)
RakanSUP	29	Too few for a rate (29 of 30)
AmbessaTOP	28	Too few for a rate (28 of 30)
K'SanteTOP	28	Too few for a rate (28 of 30)
ShenTOP	28	Too few for a rate (28 of 30)
ViktorMID	28	Too few for a rate (28 of 30)
ZeriADC	27	Too few for a rate (27 of 30)
YuumiSUP	26	Too few for a rate (26 of 30)
OrnnTOP	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
Xin ZhaoJGL	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
LissandraMID	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
YoneMID	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
JinxADC	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
SivirADC	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
BraumSUP	24	Too few for a rate (24 of 30)
MilioSUP	24	Too few for a rate (24 of 30)
RellSUP	24	Too few for a rate (24 of 30)
AkaliMID	23	Too few for a rate (23 of 30)
JhinADC	23	Too few for a rate (23 of 30)
BardSUP	23	Too few for a rate (23 of 30)
AatroxTOP	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
Dr. MundoTOP	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
TristanaADC	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
NasusTOP	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
GalioMID	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
Cho'GathJGL	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
NaafiriJGL	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
NocturneJGL	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
AuroraMID	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
LockeMID	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
Miss FortuneADC	19	Too few for a rate (19 of 30)
HweiMID	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
MorganaSUP	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
LilliaJGL	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
SejuaniJGL	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
LeBlancMID	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
OriannaMID	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
XayahADC	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
AlistarSUP	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
GnarTOP	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
XerathMID	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
KarmaSUP	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
CamilleTOP	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
YorickTOP	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
ViegoJGL	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
XerathADC	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
SeraphineSUP	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
MordekaiserTOP	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
YoneTOP	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
ZaahenTOP	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
QiyanaJGL	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
SionMID	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
PykeSUP	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
SkarnerJGL	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
RyzeMID	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
TaliyahMID	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
AsheADC	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
JaxTOP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
OlafTOP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
GravesJGL	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
Kha'ZixJGL	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
CassiopeiaMID	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
GalioMID	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
GragasTOP	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
NidaleeJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
AniviaMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
VexMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
PoppySUP	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
GarenTOP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
JayceTOP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
KennenTOP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
JayceJGL	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
PoppyJGL	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
KalistaADC	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
VayneADC	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
ViktorADC	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
NeekoSUP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
GangplankTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
GwenTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
PoppyTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
SettTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
HecarimJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
ZacJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
ZedJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
MalzaharMID	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
MelMID	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
Twisted FateMID	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
SmolderADC	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
SylasSUP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
AkaliTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
Cho'GathTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
FioraTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
EkkoJGL	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
EliseJGL	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
KaynJGL	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
DianaMID	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
YasuoMID	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
VarusADC	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
EliseSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
LuxSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
DariusTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
RumbleTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
KindredJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
PantheonJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
AnnieMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
MelADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
SeraphineADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
CamilleSUP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
GalioSUP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
PantheonSUP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
SorakaSUP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
MaokaiTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
Tahm KenchTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
TrundleTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
VarusTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
LockeJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
NaafiriJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
RammusJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
TalonJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
ZyraJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
IreliaMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
JayceMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
KassadinMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
LuxMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
ZedMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
TwitchADC	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
YasuoADC	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
Renata GlascSUP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)

Sorted by number of games · 149 pairs in this view.

Allies and opponents over 571 games, listed from 5 games per pair; under 30 games, only W/L counts are written.

How is it built?

Keystone, spells, first skill maxed and item paths, on the fallback level that has enough games.

The usual build

Read on patch 16.21, filtered regions.

Patch + region16.21 · 32 games
Patch16.21 · 66 games
2 patches322 games
Window571 games

Keystone + secondary tree

Arcane Comet+

Precision

97% · 31 games

Summoner spells

Flash + Teleport

100% · 32 games

First maxed skill

100% · 32 games

show 2 other choices of runes, spells or skill maxed

Other runes

orFirst Strike+Precision3% · 1 game
orArcane Comet+Inspiration44% · 14 games

32 games at the level read · a level is read from 30 games

Item paths

One item path, from the most played 1st item to the least.

Two 1st items share the champion (25% or more each): both builds are mixed in chapter 02.

Luden's Echo66% · 11:06
Shadowflame63% · 21:06

Each % reads along the path: at the 1st item, over the games that completed a 1st item; then, over those that made the previous steps AND completed one more item. A path stops under 10 games · median minute the item is completed, from 3 games.

show how we count

Draft, with / against and build: the filters at the top of the page (window, regions, level). What follows the meta moves fast.
In a comp and “the scene protects itself from”: 180 days of tournaments (from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12), the draft review window. A champion's kit changes little, it needs volume.
All games come from Master+ amateur tournaments. No soloQ.
A win rate is written from 30 games, always with its range. Under that threshold, wins and losses are written.
What the data does not say: the pick order (missing from the Riot API), engage (no reliable measure).